<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cross Country Shames Canada, Reveals Discriminating Attitudes Remain</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jeejeebhoy.ca/2010/02/28/cross-country-shames-canada-reveals-discriminating-attitudes-remain/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jeejeebhoy.ca/2010/02/28/cross-country-shames-canada-reveals-discriminating-attitudes-remain/</link>
	<description>Reading is just as important as taking care of yourself</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 02:45:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shireen</title>
		<link>http://jeejeebhoy.ca/2010/02/28/cross-country-shames-canada-reveals-discriminating-attitudes-remain/comment-page-1/#comment-1679</link>
		<dc:creator>Shireen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 20:58:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeejeebhoy.ca/2010/02/28/cross-country-shames-canada-reveals-discriminating-attitudes-remain/#comment-1679</guid>
		<description>As I said, performing in events that are not like the 50k are not indicative of how well they&#039;ll do in the 50k. Plus that meant they&#039;d be tired whereas McKeever was fresh and has been training specifically for the 50k. Why is it assumed that though they did unexpectedly well, McKeever couldn&#039;t? Unlike the others, including the long shots for the other races, McKeever had no chance to race at all. Just as others question coaching decisions in hockey games, I think it&#039;s perfectly fine for me and others to judge ones for cross-country, particularly as I&#039;ve said before that the coaches used McKeever to increase the profile of the sport in the Olympics but seemed to have no intention of racing him. It was a bit duplicitous and got the entire world pumped up.

I don&#039;t know where in my words you&#039;d get any idea that I have a desire for a Hollywood ending. No such thing exists. My desire is for the right thing to be done. People seem to come to this on the assumption that he&#039;s blind, ergo can&#039;t be as good as the others. As the post I linked to showed, he&#039;s competitive, and unlike the others, he specializes in the 50k and has been training for this for years. I don&#039;t know why you&#039;d assume a coach was not being discriminatory when coaches normally put the specialists in the races they specialize in, normally take out fatigued racers and put in fresh ones. Neither was done here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I said, performing in events that are not like the 50k are not indicative of how well they&#8217;ll do in the 50k. Plus that meant they&#8217;d be tired whereas McKeever was fresh and has been training specifically for the 50k. Why is it assumed that though they did unexpectedly well, McKeever couldn&#8217;t? Unlike the others, including the long shots for the other races, McKeever had no chance to race at all. Just as others question coaching decisions in hockey games, I think it&#8217;s perfectly fine for me and others to judge ones for cross-country, particularly as I&#8217;ve said before that the coaches used McKeever to increase the profile of the sport in the Olympics but seemed to have no intention of racing him. It was a bit duplicitous and got the entire world pumped up.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know where in my words you&#8217;d get any idea that I have a desire for a Hollywood ending. No such thing exists. My desire is for the right thing to be done. People seem to come to this on the assumption that he&#8217;s blind, ergo can&#8217;t be as good as the others. As the post I linked to showed, he&#8217;s competitive, and unlike the others, he specializes in the 50k and has been training for this for years. I don&#8217;t know why you&#8217;d assume a coach was not being discriminatory when coaches normally put the specialists in the races they specialize in, normally take out fatigued racers and put in fresh ones. Neither was done here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shireen</title>
		<link>http://jeejeebhoy.ca/2010/02/28/cross-country-shames-canada-reveals-discriminating-attitudes-remain/comment-page-1/#comment-1973</link>
		<dc:creator>Shireen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 20:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeejeebhoy.ca/2010/02/28/cross-country-shames-canada-reveals-discriminating-attitudes-remain/#comment-1973</guid>
		<description>As I said, performing in events that are not like the 50k are not indicative of how well they&#039;ll do in the 50k. Plus that meant they&#039;d be tired whereas McKeever was fresh and has been training specifically for the 50k. Why is it assumed that though they did unexpectedly well, McKeever couldn&#039;t? Unlike the others, including the long shots for the other races, McKeever had no chance to race at all. Just as others question coaching decisions in hockey games, I think it&#039;s perfectly fine for me and others to judge ones for cross-country, particularly as I&#039;ve said before that the coaches used McKeever to increase the profile of the sport in the Olympics but seemed to have no intention of racing him. It was a bit duplicitous and got the entire world pumped up.

I don&#039;t know where in my words you&#039;d get any idea that I have a desire for a Hollywood ending. No such thing exists. My desire is for the right thing to be done. People seem to come to this on the assumption that he&#039;s blind, ergo can&#039;t be as good as the others. As the post I linked to showed, he&#039;s competitive, and unlike the others, he specializes in the 50k and has been training for this for years. I don&#039;t know why you&#039;d assume a coach was not being discriminatory when coaches normally put the specialists in the races they specialize in, normally take out fatigued racers and put in fresh ones. Neither was done here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I said, performing in events that are not like the 50k are not indicative of how well they&#8217;ll do in the 50k. Plus that meant they&#8217;d be tired whereas McKeever was fresh and has been training specifically for the 50k. Why is it assumed that though they did unexpectedly well, McKeever couldn&#8217;t? Unlike the others, including the long shots for the other races, McKeever had no chance to race at all. Just as others question coaching decisions in hockey games, I think it&#8217;s perfectly fine for me and others to judge ones for cross-country, particularly as I&#8217;ve said before that the coaches used McKeever to increase the profile of the sport in the Olympics but seemed to have no intention of racing him. It was a bit duplicitous and got the entire world pumped up.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know where in my words you&#8217;d get any idea that I have a desire for a Hollywood ending. No such thing exists. My desire is for the right thing to be done. People seem to come to this on the assumption that he&#8217;s blind, ergo can&#8217;t be as good as the others. As the post I linked to showed, he&#8217;s competitive, and unlike the others, he specializes in the 50k and has been training for this for years. I don&#8217;t know why you&#8217;d assume a coach was not being discriminatory when coaches normally put the specialists in the races they specialize in, normally take out fatigued racers and put in fresh ones. Neither was done here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://jeejeebhoy.ca/2010/02/28/cross-country-shames-canada-reveals-discriminating-attitudes-remain/comment-page-1/#comment-1678</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 17:54:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeejeebhoy.ca/2010/02/28/cross-country-shames-canada-reveals-discriminating-attitudes-remain/#comment-1678</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know as much about the sport as you seem to, but it seems to me you&#039;re questioning a coaching decision and claiming its discriminatory. Where exactly does the discrimination come in? What&#039;s your proof for this? A hunch? A desire for a Hollywood ending?

As I read it, the four who raced were all ranked higher than Brian internationally and were all performing particularly well in their immediately previous competitions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know as much about the sport as you seem to, but it seems to me you&#8217;re questioning a coaching decision and claiming its discriminatory. Where exactly does the discrimination come in? What&#8217;s your proof for this? A hunch? A desire for a Hollywood ending?</p>
<p>As I read it, the four who raced were all ranked higher than Brian internationally and were all performing particularly well in their immediately previous competitions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://jeejeebhoy.ca/2010/02/28/cross-country-shames-canada-reveals-discriminating-attitudes-remain/comment-page-1/#comment-1972</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 17:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeejeebhoy.ca/2010/02/28/cross-country-shames-canada-reveals-discriminating-attitudes-remain/#comment-1972</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know as much about the sport as you seem to, but it seems to me you&#039;re questioning a coaching decision and claiming its discriminatory. Where exactly does the discrimination come in? What&#039;s your proof for this? A hunch? A desire for a Hollywood ending?

As I read it, the four who raced were all ranked higher than Brian internationally and were all performing particularly well in their immediately previous competitions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know as much about the sport as you seem to, but it seems to me you&#8217;re questioning a coaching decision and claiming its discriminatory. Where exactly does the discrimination come in? What&#8217;s your proof for this? A hunch? A desire for a Hollywood ending?</p>
<p>As I read it, the four who raced were all ranked higher than Brian internationally and were all performing particularly well in their immediately previous competitions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shireen</title>
		<link>http://jeejeebhoy.ca/2010/02/28/cross-country-shames-canada-reveals-discriminating-attitudes-remain/comment-page-1/#comment-1677</link>
		<dc:creator>Shireen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 16:48:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeejeebhoy.ca/2010/02/28/cross-country-shames-canada-reveals-discriminating-attitudes-remain/#comment-1677</guid>
		<description>The coaches did &lt;strong&gt;not&lt;/strong&gt; get out of his way. I found it odd that they talked about the racers&#039; times for the other races as if they were relevant to the 50k. The 50k requires endurance and tactical experience. As Canadians have come on to the cross-country scene, they&#039;ve been doing well in the shorter, faster races, but not the classic 50k. In fact, the classic has remained difficult for Canucks. Only McKeever had specialised in the classic 50k. It seems odd to me that they&#039;d leave out a 50k specialist and base their chances on how well one did in a sprint. Would you put a 100m racer in a marathon? Hardly. Even the 10k is not considered the same as a marathon and no one would ever say a 10k winner is going to do well in a marathon based on a 10k win. They&#039;d have to have shown that they can do well in the marathon before the 10k win.

Harvey, though a prodigy, was already showing fatigue in shorter races and lack of tactical experience. It&#039;s not surprising he ended up in the 30s. Two of the racers had been&lt;a href=&quot;http://pario.blogspot.com/2010/02/should-brian-mckeever-be-left-out-of.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; slower in the 50k&lt;/a&gt; than McKeever and at least one had little experience in it, hadn&#039;t even raced it in all of 2009. How do you train for a 50k if you never race it in the year before the Olympics? If people who follow cross-country could see some of these poor results happening, why not the coaches? I don&#039;t say McKeever should&#039;ve been in it just for the inspiration but because he was a specialist and had earned the spot.

So yeah, coaches and some Canadians did McKeever a disservice by being discriminatory and treated him differently. He knew it, which you can see if you listen to what he says.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The coaches did <strong>not</strong> get out of his way. I found it odd that they talked about the racers&#8217; times for the other races as if they were relevant to the 50k. The 50k requires endurance and tactical experience. As Canadians have come on to the cross-country scene, they&#8217;ve been doing well in the shorter, faster races, but not the classic 50k. In fact, the classic has remained difficult for Canucks. Only McKeever had specialised in the classic 50k. It seems odd to me that they&#8217;d leave out a 50k specialist and base their chances on how well one did in a sprint. Would you put a 100m racer in a marathon? Hardly. Even the 10k is not considered the same as a marathon and no one would ever say a 10k winner is going to do well in a marathon based on a 10k win. They&#8217;d have to have shown that they can do well in the marathon before the 10k win.</p>
<p>Harvey, though a prodigy, was already showing fatigue in shorter races and lack of tactical experience. It&#8217;s not surprising he ended up in the 30s. Two of the racers had been<a href="http://pario.blogspot.com/2010/02/should-brian-mckeever-be-left-out-of.html" rel="nofollow"> slower in the 50k</a> than McKeever and at least one had little experience in it, hadn&#8217;t even raced it in all of 2009. How do you train for a 50k if you never race it in the year before the Olympics? If people who follow cross-country could see some of these poor results happening, why not the coaches? I don&#8217;t say McKeever should&#8217;ve been in it just for the inspiration but because he was a specialist and had earned the spot.</p>
<p>So yeah, coaches and some Canadians did McKeever a disservice by being discriminatory and treated him differently. He knew it, which you can see if you listen to what he says.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shireen</title>
		<link>http://jeejeebhoy.ca/2010/02/28/cross-country-shames-canada-reveals-discriminating-attitudes-remain/comment-page-1/#comment-1971</link>
		<dc:creator>Shireen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 16:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeejeebhoy.ca/2010/02/28/cross-country-shames-canada-reveals-discriminating-attitudes-remain/#comment-1971</guid>
		<description>The coaches did &lt;strong&gt;not&lt;/strong&gt; get out of his way. I found it odd that they talked about the racers&#039; times for the other races as if they were relevant to the 50k. The 50k requires endurance and tactical experience. As Canadians have come on to the cross-country scene, they&#039;ve been doing well in the shorter, faster races, but not the classic 50k. In fact, the classic has remained difficult for Canucks. Only McKeever had specialised in the classic 50k. It seems odd to me that they&#039;d leave out a 50k specialist and base their chances on how well one did in a sprint. Would you put a 100m racer in a marathon? Hardly. Even the 10k is not considered the same as a marathon and no one would ever say a 10k winner is going to do well in a marathon based on a 10k win. They&#039;d have to have shown that they can do well in the marathon before the 10k win.

Harvey, though a prodigy, was already showing fatigue in shorter races and lack of tactical experience. It&#039;s not surprising he ended up in the 30s. Two of the racers had been&lt;a href=&quot;http://pario.blogspot.com/2010/02/should-brian-mckeever-be-left-out-of.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; slower in the 50k&lt;/a&gt; than McKeever and at least one had little experience in it, hadn&#039;t even raced it in all of 2009. How do you train for a 50k if you never race it in the year before the Olympics? If people who follow cross-country could see some of these poor results happening, why not the coaches? I don&#039;t say McKeever should&#039;ve been in it just for the inspiration but because he was a specialist and had earned the spot.

So yeah, coaches and some Canadians did McKeever a disservice by being discriminatory and treated him differently. He knew it, which you can see if you listen to what he says.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The coaches did <strong>not</strong> get out of his way. I found it odd that they talked about the racers&#8217; times for the other races as if they were relevant to the 50k. The 50k requires endurance and tactical experience. As Canadians have come on to the cross-country scene, they&#8217;ve been doing well in the shorter, faster races, but not the classic 50k. In fact, the classic has remained difficult for Canucks. Only McKeever had specialised in the classic 50k. It seems odd to me that they&#8217;d leave out a 50k specialist and base their chances on how well one did in a sprint. Would you put a 100m racer in a marathon? Hardly. Even the 10k is not considered the same as a marathon and no one would ever say a 10k winner is going to do well in a marathon based on a 10k win. They&#8217;d have to have shown that they can do well in the marathon before the 10k win.</p>
<p>Harvey, though a prodigy, was already showing fatigue in shorter races and lack of tactical experience. It&#8217;s not surprising he ended up in the 30s. Two of the racers had been<a href="http://pario.blogspot.com/2010/02/should-brian-mckeever-be-left-out-of.html" rel="nofollow"> slower in the 50k</a> than McKeever and at least one had little experience in it, hadn&#8217;t even raced it in all of 2009. How do you train for a 50k if you never race it in the year before the Olympics? If people who follow cross-country could see some of these poor results happening, why not the coaches? I don&#8217;t say McKeever should&#8217;ve been in it just for the inspiration but because he was a specialist and had earned the spot.</p>
<p>So yeah, coaches and some Canadians did McKeever a disservice by being discriminatory and treated him differently. He knew it, which you can see if you listen to what he says.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://jeejeebhoy.ca/2010/02/28/cross-country-shames-canada-reveals-discriminating-attitudes-remain/comment-page-1/#comment-1676</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 16:27:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeejeebhoy.ca/2010/02/28/cross-country-shames-canada-reveals-discriminating-attitudes-remain/#comment-1676</guid>
		<description>I feel badly for Brian as I&#039;d feel badly for any competitor that didn&#039;t make the team, but I think it was the right decision to make. If the other guys were performing better at Olympics-time, and that&#039;s the criteria by which those deicions are made, then I&#039;m in full support. Brain, himself, would understand I&#039;m sure.

The real essence of being non-discriminatory is to remove barriers and get the heck out of the way; we do Brian and many others a disservice if we treat them differently, outside of accommodations that they request themselves. 

Some have suggested that Brian should have been allowed to compete because of the heartwarming nature of the story, but that thinking reduces Brian to a prop in a selfish feel-good play and does nothing at all for him, just for us. He&#039;s a competitor and he&#039;ll keep training, keep working and he&#039;ll kick some ass.

We just need to get out of his way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel badly for Brian as I&#8217;d feel badly for any competitor that didn&#8217;t make the team, but I think it was the right decision to make. If the other guys were performing better at Olympics-time, and that&#8217;s the criteria by which those deicions are made, then I&#8217;m in full support. Brain, himself, would understand I&#8217;m sure.</p>
<p>The real essence of being non-discriminatory is to remove barriers and get the heck out of the way; we do Brian and many others a disservice if we treat them differently, outside of accommodations that they request themselves. </p>
<p>Some have suggested that Brian should have been allowed to compete because of the heartwarming nature of the story, but that thinking reduces Brian to a prop in a selfish feel-good play and does nothing at all for him, just for us. He&#8217;s a competitor and he&#8217;ll keep training, keep working and he&#8217;ll kick some ass.</p>
<p>We just need to get out of his way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://jeejeebhoy.ca/2010/02/28/cross-country-shames-canada-reveals-discriminating-attitudes-remain/comment-page-1/#comment-1970</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 16:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeejeebhoy.ca/2010/02/28/cross-country-shames-canada-reveals-discriminating-attitudes-remain/#comment-1970</guid>
		<description>I feel badly for Brian as I&#039;d feel badly for any competitor that didn&#039;t make the team, but I think it was the right decision to make. If the other guys were performing better at Olympics-time, and that&#039;s the criteria by which those deicions are made, then I&#039;m in full support. Brain, himself, would understand I&#039;m sure.

The real essence of being non-discriminatory is to remove barriers and get the heck out of the way; we do Brian and many others a disservice if we treat them differently, outside of accommodations that they request themselves. 

Some have suggested that Brian should have been allowed to compete because of the heartwarming nature of the story, but that thinking reduces Brian to a prop in a selfish feel-good play and does nothing at all for him, just for us. He&#039;s a competitor and he&#039;ll keep training, keep working and he&#039;ll kick some ass.

We just need to get out of his way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel badly for Brian as I&#8217;d feel badly for any competitor that didn&#8217;t make the team, but I think it was the right decision to make. If the other guys were performing better at Olympics-time, and that&#8217;s the criteria by which those deicions are made, then I&#8217;m in full support. Brain, himself, would understand I&#8217;m sure.</p>
<p>The real essence of being non-discriminatory is to remove barriers and get the heck out of the way; we do Brian and many others a disservice if we treat them differently, outside of accommodations that they request themselves. </p>
<p>Some have suggested that Brian should have been allowed to compete because of the heartwarming nature of the story, but that thinking reduces Brian to a prop in a selfish feel-good play and does nothing at all for him, just for us. He&#8217;s a competitor and he&#8217;ll keep training, keep working and he&#8217;ll kick some ass.</p>
<p>We just need to get out of his way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 2/17 queries in 0.012 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 442/458 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.jeejeebhoy.ca @ 2012-02-08 02:15:50 -->
